THE EFFECT OF FERTILIZER SUBSIDY ON PADDY PRODUCTION OF SMALL SCALE FARMERS: SPECIAL REFERENCE IN POLONNARUWA DISTRICTIN SRI LANKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32770/rbaos.vol133-44Keywords:
farmers, paddy cultivation, fertilizer subsidy, agricultural infrastructure.Abstract
Paddy cultivation is major part in rural agriculture sector in Sri Lanka. Majority of rural sector paddy farmers are small-scale producers. According to available data paddy production sector provides livelihood opportunities for large numbers of rural population, provide rice requirement of the nation, provide inputs to other industrial sector etc.To enhance small-scale farmers living condition as well as paddy production, Sri Lankan government promotes paddy farmers to use more fertilizer for their paddy cultivation activities. Therefore, Sri Lankan government provides subsidized fertilizer to enhance both paddy production and paddy yield per acre. Last few decades paddy production and paddy yield per acre data show continues increasing trend. At the same time government expenditure on fertilizer also becomes heavy burden to national budget. There are arguments for and against to fertilizer subsidy program and its practice. This study attempts to study the effect of fertilizer subsidy on paddy production and living condition of small-scale farmers in Polonnaruwa district in Sri Lanka. The data are used to estimate an econometric model to find the relationship between paddy productivity, fertilizer subsidy, agricultural infrastructure facilities and farmers education level. The data were collected from Bubula and Raja-elagama villages in Higurakgoda divisional secretariat in Polonnaruwa district. Structured questioner was used to collect the data from 150 farmers. The results show that there is significant relationship between paddy production and dependent variables named fertilizer subsidy, agricultural infrastructure facilities and farmers education level. Especially fertilizer subsidy and paddy productivity is significant at 5 per cent level and R2 was 0.68. This result shows that government main objective of fertilizer subsidy that improves paddy productivity has been fulfilled. At the same time, household income from paddy has also increased and it has affected their livelihoods. But poor agricultural infrastructural facilities have mitigated farmers’ income. Research results and some empirical evidence have concluded that it is important to find alternative methods to select suitable and needy farmers who are eligible to get fertilizer subsidy because conducting methods of distributing have made many kinds of effects on the efficiency of resource utilization, equity of income distribution as well as government budget. Agricultural infrastructure facilities are very important for making fertilizer subsidy programs more meaningful and to have a significant effect on enhancing paddy farmers’ living conditions.
Downloads
References
Abeygunawardhana, P. & C. A. Pope. (1986). Impacts of price and yield variation on profitability of management plans of subsistence farmers in Sri Lanka. Agricultural Administration, 22, 197-204.
Ahmed, R. (1978). Price support versus fertilizer subsidy for increasing rice production in bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 119-138.
Aluwihare, P. B. (1991). Irrigation investment trends in Sri Lanka: New construction and beyond. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Irrigation Management Institute.
Andersen, P.P. (2010, November 16). The costs and benefits of fertilizer subsidies: An illustration from Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://smkern.com/pinstrup/wordpress/? p=101.
Block, S. A. (1994). A new view of agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 619-624.
Burrell, A. (1989). The demand for fertiliser in the United Kingdom. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40(1), 1-20.
Bandara, J. & S. Jayasuriya. (2009). Distortions to agricultural incentives in Asia, Sri Lanka, in K Anderson & W Martin (eds). Washington DC, USA: The World Bank.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka. Annual Reports (various issues). Colombo: Central Bank of Sri Lank, Sri Lanka.
Dayal, E. (1984). Agricultural productivity in India: a spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(1), 98-123.
Department of Census and Statistics. (2007). Census of agriculture 2002, agriculture and environmental statistics division. Department of Census and Statistics, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.lk/agriculture/AGC2002/AGC2002. htm
Ekanayake, H. K. J. (2009). The impact of fertilizer subsidy in paddy cultivation. Staff Studies, Central Bank of Sri Lanka, 36(1&2), 73-96.
Ellis, F. (1992). Agricultural policies in developing countries. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fbi, J. C. H., & Ranis, G. (1964). Development of the labor surplus economy: theory and policy. Homewood.
Fernando, G. (1999). Overview: Economic Review, People’s Bank. Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Gunadasa, J. M. (1998). The role of multi-purpose cooperative societies in avoiding future social problems in Sri Lanka. National Development through Cooperative movement, Ministry of Cooperative Development, Information Technology Center, Sri Lanka School of Cooperative, Polgolla, 69-91.
Griliches, Z. (1958). The national or regional demand for total fertilizer or nutrient application on all crops. Western Journal of Agricultural Economic, 7(2).
Heady, E. O., & Yeh, M. H. (1959). National and regional demand functions for fertilizer. Journal of Farm Economics, 41(2), 332-348.
Huffman, W. E., & Evenson, R. E. (1992). Contributions of public and private science and technology to US agricultural productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3), 751-756.
Herath, H. M. K. V., Gunawardena, E. R. N., & Wickramasinghe, W. M. A. D. B. (2015). The impact of “Kethata Aruna” fertilizer subsidy programme on fertilizer use and paddy production in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research, 25(1),14-26.
Hu, F. & Antle, J.M. (1993). Agriculture policy and productivity: International evidence, applied economic perspectives and policy. Oxford Journals, 15(3), 495-505.
Jayawickrama, A. & W.M.G.T.S. Sudarshani, (2010). The impact of fertilizer subsidy on agricultural production. Prathimana-06, Sociology Research Forum, University of Ruhuna.
Jayawardana, S.S.B.G.D. & Weerasena, L.A. (2000). Crop diversification in Sri Lanka. Department of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Johnston, B. F., & Mellor, J. W. (1961). The role of agriculture in economic development. The American Economic Review, 51(4), 566-593.
Kuznets, S. (1964). Economic Growth and the Contribution of Agriculture. In C. K. Eicher & L.W. Witt (Eds.) Agriculture in economic development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The manchester school, 22(2), 139-191.
Mellor, J. W. (1963). The use and productivity of farm family labor in early stages of agricultural development. Journal of Farm Economics, 45(3), 517-534.
Ramli, N. N., Shamsudin, M. N., Mohamed, Z., & Radam, A. (2012). The impact of fertilizer subsidy on Malaysia paddy/rice industry using a system dynamics approach. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 213-219.
Salunkhe, H. A., & Deshmush, B. B. (2012). The overview of government subsidies to agriculture sector in India. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 1(5), 43-47.
Economic and social cost of fertilizer subsidy on paddy farming in Sri Lanka & M. Semasinghe. (2014). Economic and social cost of fertilizer subsidy on paddy farming in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(10).
Semasinghe, W. M. (2014). Economic and social cost of fertilizer subsidy on paddy farming in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(10).
Thanawala, K. (2006). Schumpeter's theory of economic development and development economics. Review of Social Economy, 52(4), 353-363. http://dx.doi.org?10.1080/758523229.
The World Bank Group. (2003). Sri lanka: Promoting agricultural rural non-farm sector growth. Rural Development Unit, South Asia Region, World Bank, Vol. I and II.
Weerahewa, J., S.S., Kodithuwakku & Ariyawardana, A. (2010). The fertilizer subsidy program in Sri Lanka, case study no 7-11 of the programs: food policy for developing countries: the role of government in the global food systems. New York: Cornell University.
Wijetunga, W. M. L. K., Thiruchelvam, S., & Balamurali, N. (2008). Impact of “KETHATA ARUNA” fertilizer subsidy on paddy production in Minipe Scheme. In Second Annual Research Forum of the Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association, October (Vol. 3).
Wickramasinghe, W., Samarasinha, G., & Epasinghe, S. (2009). Fertilizer policy on paddy farming: Evaluation of subsidy program 2005. Hector Kobbekaduwa Agrarian Research and Training Institute, Colombo. Unpublished report.
Yamaguchi, M., & Sanker, S. (2007). Growth accounting for sri lanka's agriculture with special reference to fertilizer and nonagricultural prices: do policy reforms affect agricultural development?. The Developing Economies, 45(2), 194-219.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2019 M B Ranathilaka & SettingsI.A.J Imbulana Arachchi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Review of Behavioral Aspect in Organizations and Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
